igaming PaySolutions
Independent B2B directory

iGaming Payment Solutions for Operators

Most operators meet the same wall twice. A launch stack stops scaling — declines climb in one market, settlement drags in another. Then the brand enters a new jurisdiction and the whole stack has to be rebuilt around a regulator it has never dealt with.

We track the payment providers that work with online casinos, sportsbooks and other iGaming operators, sort them by what they genuinely do rather than what they call themselves, and put them side by side — so you compare in one sitting instead of reading a dozen sales pages in a row.

One deposit, three layerslive path
PLAYER CASHIER ORCHESTRATION PROCESSING

Every provider in the catalogue sits on one of these layers. Knowing which one tells you what a pitch is actually offering.

The catalogue

Compare payment providers for iGaming

Every provider gets the same card: the layer it sits on, the licences it holds, the regions and methods it covers, how fast it settles and how it prices — plus our weighted score and how much of the card the supplier actually discloses.

20 providers

PAYSTRAX

Direct acquirer · UK & EU
7.7Strong
AcquiringGatewayOwn acquiring
Licences
FCA (UK) · Bank of Lithuania · Principal Member Visa & Mastercard
Settlement
17 fiat currencies or stablecoin
Methods
Cards, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Click to Pay

Paysafe

Full-stack PSP · 12 locations
7.4Strong
Full-stack PSPCash online48 currencies
Licences
FCA e-money · Central Bank of Ireland
Pricing
Interchange Plus
Clients
200,000 businesses (self-reported)

Inpay

Cross-border payouts · Copenhagen
7.4Strong
PayoutsOpen banking90+ countries
Licences
Danish FSA · SWIFT member
Settlement
Instant, 24×7×365
Founded
2008 · 180+ staff

Genome

PSP / EMI · Lithuania
7.1Strong
PSP / EMISEPA InstantOpen banking
Licences
EMI, Bank of Lithuania
Settlement
Instant payouts to business accounts
Compliance
PCI DSS · PSD2 · GDPR · DORA

BCB Group

Crypto & fiat rails · UK · France · UAE
7.0Strong
Crypto + fiatAccounts24/7 BLINC
Licences
FCA 807377 · ACPR EMI · VARA in progress
Settlement
Instant, 24/7
Methods
40+ fiat and cryptocurrencies

Nuvei

Full-stack PSP · Global
6.7Adequate
Full-stack PSPOrchestrationPayouts
Certifications
PCI DSS Level 1 Service Provider
Methods
Cards, eWallets, crypto, APMs
Support
24/7/365

Rapyd

Full-stack PSP · Global
6.6Adequate
Local railsCard acquiringInstant payouts
Settlement
Instant payouts 24/7, cards and stablecoins
Methods
Local rails, cards, stablecoins
Integration
Hosted checkout, payment links, API

OpenPayd

Embedded finance · vIBAN · Malta · Canada
6.6Adequate
vIBANStablecoinsRail-agnostic
Licences
MFSA Financial Institution C 75580 · FINTRAC M19528814
Settlement
Real time
Feature
A virtual IBAN per player

CatalystPay

Gateway · multi-acquirer · Belfast, UK
6.5Adequate
Gateway30+ acquirersResells acquiring
Pricing
IC++ from 1% + €0.30 (EEA/UK cards)
Certifications
PCI DSS Level 1
Currencies
150+

Zimpler

Open banking · A2A · Stockholm
5.6Adequate
Open bankingA2AInstant
Licences
Finansinspektionen, payment institution (SE)
Settlement
Instant
Methods
Account-to-account via open banking APIs

PayDo

PSP / EMI · Europe · UK
5.2Adequate
PSP / EMI350+ methodsLicences unnamed
Licences
Three licences, no regulator named
Currencies
Multi-currency IBAN in 19 currencies
Pricing
SEPA 0.5% (min €5) · card top-up 3.4% + €0.20

North

Processing & acquiring · Troy, Michigan
4.8Limited
AcquiringUS onlyNext-day funding
Founded
1992 · 1,000+ staff
Settlement
Same day or next day funding
Certifications
PCI DSS validated · P2PE · 3-D Secure

Primer

Orchestration · Global
4.7Limited
OrchestrationNo underwritingNamed clients
Clients
Printify, Lime, Cleeng, GetYourGuide, Eldorado
Integration
API, Global Accounts, AI Companion
Funding
Series C $100M, 2026

Fluid

Cashier layer · iGaming only
4.5Limited
CashieriGaming onlyAny gateway
Founded
February 2023 · Fluidwave Technologies Ltd
Integration
Runs several gateways in parallel, no code change
Clients
50+ operators live (self-reported)

Finix

Payments tech · United States
4.3Limited
ProcessingPayfacUS only
Uptime
99.999% across 365 days
Pricing
Flat, dynamic or custom · no interchange markup
Integration
One integration, REST API

Approvely

Payment infrastructure · Regulated markets
4.1Limited
Multi-railSame-day reviewLicences undisclosed
Settlement
Instant liquidity on stablecoin rails
Risk
AML, KYC, chargeback monitoring, behavioural analytics
Scope
75+ industries, low to high risk

BillBlend

Gateway · London, UK
4.1Limited
GatewayLocal methodsLicence undisclosed
Methods
Pix, Boleto, UPI, PayTM, SPEI, MomoPay, JazzCash, bKash
Regions
Asia, LATAM, Türkiye, CIS
Licences
None disclosed

iGaming Core

Broker · London, UK
4.0Limited
BrokerResells24/7 contact
Model
Access to third-party gateways and processors via partners
Also sells
Legal and licensing, consulting, correspondent banking
Licences
None of its own

EMS Ltd Global

Broker / ISO · Europe & US
3.4Limited
Broker / ISOResellsHigh-risk
Model
High-risk merchant accounts plus company formation
Methods
Visa, USDC crypto bridge, multi-currency IBAN
Licences
None named; claims Swiss-regulated security

Shift4

Processing & acquiring · United States
—None
AcquiringNot yet collected
Status
Site behind bot protection — fields to be collected manually
Segment
Casinos and gaming
Data
2 of 21 fields
Know what you are buying

The three layers of an iGaming payment stack

Almost every argument about payment providers gets muddled because three different jobs share one vocabulary. Separate them and the market becomes much easier to read.

Layer 01 — moves the money

Processing & acquiring

An acquirer holds the relationship with the card schemes and banks, takes the risk on your merchant account, and decides whether it wants your vertical at all — which, for gambling, is the entire question. A gateway alone carries the transaction but gives you no acquiring relationship; a PSP bundles both under one contract.

GainApproval rates no front-end polish can recover.
CostA weak one closes your account three months after launch.
Processing providers →
Layer 02 — decides where it goes

Orchestration

Once you run more than two processors — and any operator in more than one market eventually does — something has to route each transaction to the rail most likely to approve it, retry failures elsewhere, and reconcile it all into one ledger.

GainSwap a processor without touching your product.
CostOne more integration and one more fee in the chain.
Orchestrators →
Layer 03 — what the player sees

The cashier

Deposit and withdrawal flows, method selection, limits, KYC prompts — the moment where a player either funds an account or gives up. Some platforms ship one, some gateways include one, some operators build their own.

GainThe cheapest conversion you will ever buy.
CostOwning it means owning the UX debt too.
Deposits & withdrawals →
Coverage

Alternative payment methods, and the point they stop being optional

Cards are still the default in most regulated markets, and in several of them also the weakest link: UK credit cards have been barred from gambling since 2020*, and in large parts of LATAM, Africa and Asia a card-only cashier simply will not convert. Alternative payment solutions are not a hedge against cards — they are how you enter a market where cards were never the answer.

Open banking & pay-by-bank

First choice in the Nordics, climbing across Europe. Settles faster and costs less than cards, and sidesteps issuer declines entirely.

Open banking →

Crypto & stablecoins

Solves cross-border payouts and high-risk acceptance elegantly, then hands you a compliance workload worth thinking hard about first.

Crypto payments →

E-wallets

The quiet workhorse of the sector — still the method a large share of experienced players reach for first.

All methods →

Local rails

Pix, UPI, mobile money. Non-negotiable the moment you enter the markets built on them.

Regional coverage →
Shortlisting

Best iGaming payment providers: the criteria that actually separate them

We do not hand out a single winner. The best solution for a mobile-first casino launching in Brazil has almost nothing in common with the best one for a UK-licensed sportsbook. What transfers between cases is the set of questions worth asking — and most shortlists collapse under five of them.

Ask for all five in writing and check them against the provider's licence register entry yourself before the commercial conversation starts.

01

Approval rate in your markets

Not a global average. By country, by method, over a named period, for gambling merchants specifically.

02

Settlement speed and reserve terms

Instant to T+7 is a genuine spread, and a rolling reserve changes your working capital more than any fee line.

03

Method coverage where you are going

Not where you already are. A provider strong in Europe may have nothing usable in LATAM.

04

Appetite for the vertical

Whether it underwrites gambling itself or resells someone who does — and what happens when your chargeback ratio moves.

05

What the SLA actually commits to

Uptime, support response, and who is reachable at 3am on a Saturday — when a cashier outage costs the most.

Regional shortlists

Top 5 payment providers by region

Payment markets are regional before they are anything else. Pick a region to see the providers operators shortlist there, ordered by score, and what makes that market its own problem.

Europe

Regulation is per-country and so is the stack. Open banking is mature, card approvals are solid, and the real work is holding a separate licence conversation in every market you enter.

Open banking matureSEPA InstantLicence per market
Dominant railCards + A2A
Typical settlementT+1 – T+3
In the catalogue5
01PAYSTRAX7.7AcquiringFCA · Bank of Lithuania
02Genome7.1PSP / EMIBank of Lithuania
03BCB Group7.0Crypto + fiatFCA 807377 · ACPR
04CatalystPay6.5Gateway30+ acquirers
05Zimpler5.6Open bankingFinansinspektionen
Failure modes

What breaks in iGaming payments

The problems are consistent enough across operators that you can plan for them. None is solved by picking a better single provider — they are solved by building a stack where any one component can fail without taking the cashier down with it.

Most expensive

Declines

Issuers treat gambling MCCs as high risk by default, and a deposit that fails at the cashier is usually a player who does not come back that evening.

Compounding

Chargebacks

As much a KYC problem as a payments one — and the ratio that decides whether your acquirer keeps you.

Structural

Account closure

Thirty days' notice, a reserve held longer than the contract implied, and a local rail that turns out to be resold three layers deep.

Quiet

Reconciliation

Five providers, five report formats, and nobody able to close the month. Routing above the processing layer is worth more than a slightly better rate.

Fraud & security →  High-risk merchant accounts →

Methodology

How we score providers

Every provider is reviewed against the same 21 fields and scored on five weighted criteria, 1 to 10. iGaming fit carries the most weight because it decides whether a provider is usable at all; user reviews are shown for context and carry none, since player reviews of casinos say nothing about B2B acquiring quality.

Where a provider does not disclose something, the field reads not disclosed and the criterion is capped at Adequate rather than scored on a guess. Cards carry the date of the last review and our own assessment alongside the supplier's claims, so you can see where the two diverge.

Full methodology →
iGaming fit30%
Coverage & local acquiring22%
Compliance & security20%
Commercial terms16%
Tech & integration12%
User reviews—
Before you sign

How to choose an iGaming payment solution

Start from the licence, not the provider. Your jurisdiction determines which processors can legally take you, what you must do with player funds, and which methods you are allowed to offer — and that shortlist is usually much shorter than the market looks. Have your documentation ready before the first call: gaming licence, company and UBO details, processing history with volumes and chargeback ratios, AML policy, and the domains you will run. Underwriting moves at the speed of the slowest missing document.

Then price it properly. The headline rate is rarely where the money is — look for the setup fee, monthly minimum, per-transaction floor, FX spread on settlement, chargeback and refund fees, and the size and duration of any rolling reserve. Two providers quoting the same percentage can differ by a factor on the effective cost. Ask what the contract term is, what the exit looks like, and whether the integration you are about to build is portable if the answer to either is worse than you hoped.

FAQ

iGaming payments: common questions

What is an iGaming payment solution?

The combination of services that lets an operator take deposits and send withdrawals: a processor or acquirer that moves the money, usually a gateway that carries the transaction, often an orchestration layer that routes between several providers, and the cashier the player interacts with. Some vendors sell all of it under one contract; most operators end up assembling it from two or three specialists.

What SLA does a typical iGaming payment solution offer?

Most providers commit to 99.9% uptime on the gateway, with support response tiers rather than resolution times. That figure still allows several hours of downtime a year, so the clause worth negotiating is not the percentage but what happens during an incident: who you can reach out of hours, how failover works, and whether anything is actually owed to you when it does not.

What fees do iGaming payment solutions typically charge operators?

Expect a per-transaction percentage plus a fixed amount, a monthly minimum, and setup or integration fees. Gambling merchants also carry higher chargeback fees and, almost always, a rolling reserve — a percentage of volume held for a set period. The reserve is usually the largest real cost and the one least visible in a quoted rate.

How do I choose a payment solution for a new online casino?

Work backwards from your licence and your first two target markets. Confirm which processors underwrite gambling in those jurisdictions, check that they cover the local methods players there expect, then compare approval rates and settlement terms among the ones left. Keep the integration portable so your second provider does not require a rebuild.

Can an operator replace a mainstream processor like Stripe without disrupting players?

Yes, and most regulated operators have to, since the large mainstream processors do not support real-money gambling. The clean route is to add an orchestration layer first, run the new provider alongside the old one for a period, then shift traffic gradually rather than cutting over in one release.

What documentation is needed to set up a payment solution?

A valid gaming licence, corporate documents with UBO disclosure, processing history with volumes and chargeback ratios, your AML and responsible gambling policies, the domains you operate, and bank details for settlement. Underwriting on a gambling account typically takes two to six weeks once the file is complete.

How do payment solutions handle responsible gambling limits?

Deposit limits are enforced by the platform rather than the payment provider, but the payment layer supplies what makes them work — method-level controls, blocking of prohibited instruments such as credit cards where a regulator requires it, and the transaction data that feeds affordability checks.