
PAYSTRAX
- Licences
- FCA (UK) · Bank of Lithuania · Principal Member Visa & Mastercard
- Settlement
- 17 fiat currencies or stablecoin
- Methods
- Cards, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Click to Pay
Most operators meet the same wall twice. A launch stack stops scaling — declines climb in one market, settlement drags in another. Then the brand enters a new jurisdiction and the whole stack has to be rebuilt around a regulator it has never dealt with.
We track the payment providers that work with online casinos, sportsbooks and other iGaming operators, sort them by what they genuinely do rather than what they call themselves, and put them side by side — so you compare in one sitting instead of reading a dozen sales pages in a row.
Every provider in the catalogue sits on one of these layers. Knowing which one tells you what a pitch is actually offering.
Every provider gets the same card: the layer it sits on, the licences it holds, the regions and methods it covers, how fast it settles and how it prices — plus our weighted score and how much of the card the supplier actually discloses.
20 providers

















No providers on this layer yet.
Almost every argument about payment providers gets muddled because three different jobs share one vocabulary. Separate them and the market becomes much easier to read.
An acquirer holds the relationship with the card schemes and banks, takes the risk on your merchant account, and decides whether it wants your vertical at all — which, for gambling, is the entire question. A gateway alone carries the transaction but gives you no acquiring relationship; a PSP bundles both under one contract.
Once you run more than two processors — and any operator in more than one market eventually does — something has to route each transaction to the rail most likely to approve it, retry failures elsewhere, and reconcile it all into one ledger.
Deposit and withdrawal flows, method selection, limits, KYC prompts — the moment where a player either funds an account or gives up. Some platforms ship one, some gateways include one, some operators build their own.
Cards are still the default in most regulated markets, and in several of them also the weakest link: UK credit cards have been barred from gambling since 2020*, and in large parts of LATAM, Africa and Asia a card-only cashier simply will not convert. Alternative payment solutions are not a hedge against cards — they are how you enter a market where cards were never the answer.
First choice in the Nordics, climbing across Europe. Settles faster and costs less than cards, and sidesteps issuer declines entirely.
Open banking →Solves cross-border payouts and high-risk acceptance elegantly, then hands you a compliance workload worth thinking hard about first.
Crypto payments →The quiet workhorse of the sector — still the method a large share of experienced players reach for first.
All methods →Pix, UPI, mobile money. Non-negotiable the moment you enter the markets built on them.
Regional coverage →We do not hand out a single winner. The best solution for a mobile-first casino launching in Brazil has almost nothing in common with the best one for a UK-licensed sportsbook. What transfers between cases is the set of questions worth asking — and most shortlists collapse under five of them.
Ask for all five in writing and check them against the provider's licence register entry yourself before the commercial conversation starts.
Not a global average. By country, by method, over a named period, for gambling merchants specifically.
Instant to T+7 is a genuine spread, and a rolling reserve changes your working capital more than any fee line.
Not where you already are. A provider strong in Europe may have nothing usable in LATAM.
Whether it underwrites gambling itself or resells someone who does — and what happens when your chargeback ratio moves.
Uptime, support response, and who is reachable at 3am on a Saturday — when a cashier outage costs the most.
Payment markets are regional before they are anything else. Pick a region to see the providers operators shortlist there, ordered by score, and what makes that market its own problem.
Regulation is per-country and so is the stack. Open banking is mature, card approvals are solid, and the real work is holding a separate licence conversation in every market you enter.
A state-by-state map in the US and a separate one in Canada, where a handful of domestic bank rails carry most of the volume. Providers live or die on their licensing footprint, not their feature set.
Pix reset the Brazilian market and instant local rails now set the expectation everywhere else. Local acquiring is the difference between a working cashier and a dead one.
The most fragmented market on this list, and the one where a regional specialist beats a global processor most often. Legality varies sharply by country and changes quickly.
Mobile money is the primary rail, not an alternative one, and coverage is decided operator by operator rather than country by country.
A narrow band of licensed opportunity surrounded by prohibition, which puts jurisdiction and counterparty risk ahead of every commercial term.
The problems are consistent enough across operators that you can plan for them. None is solved by picking a better single provider — they are solved by building a stack where any one component can fail without taking the cashier down with it.
Issuers treat gambling MCCs as high risk by default, and a deposit that fails at the cashier is usually a player who does not come back that evening.
As much a KYC problem as a payments one — and the ratio that decides whether your acquirer keeps you.
Thirty days' notice, a reserve held longer than the contract implied, and a local rail that turns out to be resold three layers deep.
Five providers, five report formats, and nobody able to close the month. Routing above the processing layer is worth more than a slightly better rate.
Every provider is reviewed against the same 21 fields and scored on five weighted criteria, 1 to 10. iGaming fit carries the most weight because it decides whether a provider is usable at all; user reviews are shown for context and carry none, since player reviews of casinos say nothing about B2B acquiring quality.
Where a provider does not disclose something, the field reads not disclosed and the criterion is capped at Adequate rather than scored on a guess. Cards carry the date of the last review and our own assessment alongside the supplier's claims, so you can see where the two diverge.
Full methodology →Start from the licence, not the provider. Your jurisdiction determines which processors can legally take you, what you must do with player funds, and which methods you are allowed to offer — and that shortlist is usually much shorter than the market looks. Have your documentation ready before the first call: gaming licence, company and UBO details, processing history with volumes and chargeback ratios, AML policy, and the domains you will run. Underwriting moves at the speed of the slowest missing document.
Then price it properly. The headline rate is rarely where the money is — look for the setup fee, monthly minimum, per-transaction floor, FX spread on settlement, chargeback and refund fees, and the size and duration of any rolling reserve. Two providers quoting the same percentage can differ by a factor on the effective cost. Ask what the contract term is, what the exit looks like, and whether the integration you are about to build is portable if the answer to either is worse than you hoped.
The combination of services that lets an operator take deposits and send withdrawals: a processor or acquirer that moves the money, usually a gateway that carries the transaction, often an orchestration layer that routes between several providers, and the cashier the player interacts with. Some vendors sell all of it under one contract; most operators end up assembling it from two or three specialists.
Most providers commit to 99.9% uptime on the gateway, with support response tiers rather than resolution times. That figure still allows several hours of downtime a year, so the clause worth negotiating is not the percentage but what happens during an incident: who you can reach out of hours, how failover works, and whether anything is actually owed to you when it does not.
Expect a per-transaction percentage plus a fixed amount, a monthly minimum, and setup or integration fees. Gambling merchants also carry higher chargeback fees and, almost always, a rolling reserve — a percentage of volume held for a set period. The reserve is usually the largest real cost and the one least visible in a quoted rate.
Work backwards from your licence and your first two target markets. Confirm which processors underwrite gambling in those jurisdictions, check that they cover the local methods players there expect, then compare approval rates and settlement terms among the ones left. Keep the integration portable so your second provider does not require a rebuild.
Yes, and most regulated operators have to, since the large mainstream processors do not support real-money gambling. The clean route is to add an orchestration layer first, run the new provider alongside the old one for a period, then shift traffic gradually rather than cutting over in one release.
A valid gaming licence, corporate documents with UBO disclosure, processing history with volumes and chargeback ratios, your AML and responsible gambling policies, the domains you operate, and bank details for settlement. Underwriting on a gambling account typically takes two to six weeks once the file is complete.
Deposit limits are enforced by the platform rather than the payment provider, but the payment layer supplies what makes them work — method-level controls, blocking of prohibited instruments such as credit cards where a regulator requires it, and the transaction data that feeds affordability checks.